§ Feedback · Buyer Validation Survey

Shape what we build next.

8 questions. 90 seconds. Every submission mints a cryptographically signed receipt — so you can prove later that your answer shaped the roadmap. Don't trust. Quantum-notarize.

Questions
8 · ~90 seconds
Identity
Anonymous · email optional
Receipt
Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 signed
Question 1 of 8 0%
Question 01 · Urgency
How urgent is AI decision governance for your org right now?
1 = not on the radar · 10 = audit deadline is imminent.
Not urgentCritical now
Question 02 · Maturity
How mature is your current AI governance program?
1 = nothing in place · 10 = full GRC stack deployed.
Starting from zeroFully mature
Question 03 · PMF Signal
How would you feel if Trust Gate no longer existed?
The classic Sean Ellis PMF question. We read every answer personally.
Very disappointed — I'd have a real problem on my hands.
Somewhat disappointed — I'd find a workaround eventually.
Not disappointed — there are alternatives I'd use instead.
Not relevant — I don't have this problem yet.
Question 04 · Price Anchor
What would your org realistically pay for AI decision governance, per year?
Honest answers help us price something you can actually buy.
$0 — won't pay, needs to be free.
Under $50K — small budget line.
$50K – $180K — Trust Bootcamp tier.
$180K – $600K — Enterprise / Federal.
$600K+ — Sovereign / mission-critical.
Question 05 · Friction
What's the #1 thing stopping you from deploying AI decision governance today?
No right answer. Budget, time, leadership buy-in, vendor fatigue — anything goes.
0 / 500
Question 06 · Memory Anchor
What moment from your last failed AI rollout — or AI audit — do you remember most?
Specific is good. The board meeting, the regulator email, the dashboard going red. Whatever stuck.
0 / 500
Question 07 · Peer Density
How many peers in your buying committee already know about a solution like this?
Centola's 25% threshold: when a quarter of decision-makers move, the rest follow.
None — I'm the first one looking.
1–2 peers — early conversations happening.
3–5 peers — the cohort is mobilizing.
6+ peers — past the tipping point.
Don't know yet — haven't surveyed the committee.
Question 08 · Risk Frame
Which would actually move you off the fence?
The same 90 days, framed three different ways. Be honest about what reduces your risk perception.
90-day trial — full access, can cancel anytime.
low commit · standard saas
90-day guarantee — pay upfront, full refund if it doesn't deliver.
we carry the risk · certainty equivalent
Neither — prove it first via a case study from a peer in my industry.
social proof > trial mechanics
Optional · Personalized Benchmark Report
Want your answers benchmarked against your peers?
Drop your email and we'll send back a personalized "where you stand vs your industry" report within 48 hours. Skip this block to stay fully anonymous — your signed receipt still mints either way.
Every submission mints a real Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 hybrid receipt
Something went wrong. Please try again.
✓ Cryptographically Signed · Receipt Minted

Your answer is notarized.

Every submission becomes a signed TrustAtom receipt — provable later that your input shaped the roadmap. We personally read every response. If you provided email, your benchmark report arrives within 48 hours.

RECEIPT-ID
FILED
SIGNERtrust-gate.cyberwarriornetwork.com
ALGORITHMEd25519
EVIDENCE-HASH
ED25519-SIG
✓ Verifiable forever · verify independently ↗
◀ Back to Trust Gate Try the Apocalypse Drill →